Just a thought on the hot debate over women’s rights. I am all for them, specifically the unborn female children in the wombs of the women that have participated in the act of creation.
When does our right remove our responsibility from the equation? Why does the unborn woman not have the right to live? She didn’t ask to be created in the womb, but she has been, and deserves to have her rights championed by those with voices.
I understand the pressures that society brings to bear on women these days, and that we all make mistakes, but is a child truly the mistake? All three of my children were unplanned. After my first child, who has moderate to severe Cerebral Palsy, Trisha and I decided to stick with her; and not to spread our attention and finances out over other children.
It all comes down to what value has a life? When is it okay to take it? Is it ever okay to take it? If you go by life begins at a detectable heartbeat, then that would be as early as 5 weeks. Abortion after 5 weeks stops a beating heart. Of course there is God’s point of view as well…
Jeremiah 1:5 (NKJV)
5 “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you;
Before you were born I sanctified you…
As far as what quality of life will that child have if brought into the world without married parents, a certain amount of wealth etc… I am reminded of the amazing good that Kierstin has brought into this world. However if you listen to the extreme proponents of abortion rights you find the following…
In the book Practical Ethics, author Peter Singer argues the case for selective infanticide. “At present parents can choose to keep or destroy their disabled offspring only if the disability happens to be detected during pregnancy. There is no logical basis for restricting parents’ choice to these particular disabilities. If disabled newborn infants were not regarded as having a right to life until, say, a week or a month after birth it would allow parents, in consultation with their doctors, to choose on the basis of far greater knowledge of the infant’s condition than is possible before birth.”
What kind of quality of life does Kierstin have? Well, her life is so much more than what she gets out of it, she has given more than the world could ever give back. As far as my personal situation, God had other plans and 10 years later Chloe was conceived. She was a puzzle piece that we hadn’t even realized that we were missing. Then about 5 years later came Nate the Great the son of my old age. I wouldn’t trade these ‘mistakes’ for the world. The mistake in unwanted pregnancies is not the creation of the innocent child in the womb, it was the mistake of the act of creating them. When this occurs, responsibility trumps ‘rights’.
In my discussion with a young lady that was concerned about her rights she pointed out that when you find yourself alone in this predicament (of an unwanted or unexpected pregnancy), things that used to be black and white become grey and that no one else should be able to make this decision for her. Unfortunately, there is more than one person in the predicament, there are three. In particular, there is one without a voice… The unborn. The laws of the land ought to protect the weakest among us. The real question is who’s body has more rights? The woman that chose to participate in the act to create life has more responsibility than right. The child, innocent in the womb ought to have the right to live.
This same young lady agreed that abortion should not be used as a contraceptive and yet chose to argue through the merit of simply making a mistake and having an accident. What is that if not contraception? Check out these stats…
- On average, women give at least 3 reasons for choosing abortion: 3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities; about 3/4 say they cannot afford a child; and 1/2 say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner (AGI).
- Only 12% of women included a physical problem with their health among reasons for having an abortion (NAF).
- One per cent (of aborting women) reported that they were the survivors of rape (NAF).
Having now known a number of women that have been the willing victims of abortion, I have so much more compassion than ever before. The Lord has a pardon waiting for every sin, every mistake a human being could possibly make (with one notable exception). Whether she was told, it’s just a glob of tissue or whether she went into the abortion willingly knowing that glob of tissue was a living soul, Jesus death, burial and resurrection can secure forgiveness and deliverance for anyone willing to come. Our problem in regards to any sin, be it abortion or divorce or drinking or homosexuality is that many of us refuse to look at it for what it is and therefore can never really be free from the condemnation of what we have done. My dear friends, accept responsibility for what you have done, come to Jesus and live!
As a disclaimer, I will concede abortion for rape, and incest, as these women weren’t willing participants in the creation of the life within their wombs, but I do applaud and I am humbled by the women that carry the child to term . I must also concede those rare occasions where the life of the mother is at clear and present risk. This position is one held by perhaps the majority of the nation, it isn’t extreme in the least and yet, it is being painted as such. I really hope that perhaps the Lord would use this post to encourage those that have been through the horror of abortion, and for those that haven’t perhaps you will think twice. Then there is the time coming in a few short weeks where all must vote our conscience. I vote life. I hope that you will too. Vote women’s rights if you must, but at least consider all of the UNBORN women’s rights that have no voice and maybe, just maybe be their voice.